A reader asked a great question on my post about explaining myself, and I wanted to respond at length:
How do you reconcile this approach with the demands of Christianity to submit to authority (Scripture, the Church, sensus fidelium, etc)? Doesn’t Christianity demand not only that we conform to its doctrines, but also to be able to justify our ideas by appeal to the sources?
I’ve enjoyed your posts on being an INFP tremendously, and wanted to put some of your ideas into practice, but I’ve felt unsure of how to do so as a Catholic. What if I end up being a heretic?
I’m not a practicing Catholic, and my views are likely heterodox; but I can relate to your struggle.
Studying Catholic theology and philosophy as part of my own search left me with some big questions, especially when challenged by friends or family.
But I think there are a couple of different issues here.
The first issue is about me as an INFP having embraced my inferior function (extroverted Thinking) and subsequently letting go of it.
This is really a question of how we arrive at judgements, and I think you’ll find that Catholicism does not require you to arrive at judgements in a particular way, it just requires assent.
In that sense it doesn’t matter whether a person says “I feel this is true” or “I think this is true”.
There’s a lot of apologetics material out there that blames poor formation and sloppy thinking for the crisis in the Church and the broader culture.
Apologists have written in criticism of “feelings” as a basis for belief. But honestly that’s just a prejudice given by people (mostly Cholerics – xNTx) who want everyone to play on their intellectual “home turf”.
Feeling as a judging function in the Jungian/MBTI sense is more subjective, harder to communicate, and harder to scrutinise than Thinking; but that doesn’t mean it’s invalid.
No one can claim that Thinking renders people inerrant and brings only objectivity and convergence of opinion.
On the contrary, scripture and Church history are full of instances of conversion and holiness that have little to do with intellectual formation or education.
So who says that Thinking is superior to Feeling?
That brings me to the second issue: what is it that makes a person believe?
I don’t have a simple answer to this one. Faith is a gift – and a divinely infused virtue. If God decides whom to give faith to, then is there anything for us to worry about?
If you look at Aquinas on predestination, free will, and providence it is clear that nothing is outside of God’s command or God’s plan.
Yet even your grappling with questions such as these is part of God’s plan, is it not?
Does God make believers believe and heretics diverge?
When I start thinking about these kinds of questions I quickly resolve to a feeling that “all is well”. I trust that inner knowing, and it clearly transcends my intellectual activity without nullifying it.
What it does nullify are anxieties and worries, including (for me) any fear of being in the wrong.
I feel comforted by the knowledge that everything is in God’s hands and always has been, and our role in it all remains a mystery even though the outcome is guaranteed.
Isaiah’s words on the potter and the clay come to mind.
If that still doesn’t bring me to accept certain teachings, then that is how I am. In the end, if you don’t want to be a heretic that is a pretty good indicator that you won’t be.