The basic premise of “positive thinking” is that “your thoughts create your reality”.
One of the obstacles I’ve encountered is a narrow or limited interpretation of “reality”.
In the beginning I think I intentionally partitioned “the reality shaped by my thoughts” off from “actual reality”, because…well let’s face it: positive thinking material sounds like cringe-worthy new-age rubbish.
But at the same time I knew from philosophy of mind and psychology that our beliefs do shape our mood and our experience, and that our perceptions are highly malleable.
I also knew from personal experience that a change in belief or perception can have results that seem nigh-miraculous.
And because of my broader spiritual and metaphysical beliefs, I don’t have any trouble with the idea of actual miracles either.
But still, I maintained a kind of distinction between the “reality” I was seeking to change, and actual reality; and this distinction is problematic.
It’s problematic because if I can conceive of a reality apart from my all-encompassing experience of reality, then I can have thoughts and beliefs about that “real reality” that contradict or undermine what I’m trying to achieve in changing my thoughts.
So long as I hold on to a distinction between subjective and objective reality, there’s going to be some wriggle room or ambiguity in my work.
It’s the same as my recovery from my auto-immune disease. For a long time I investigated the psychogenic aspect of it, while still refusing to commit to a psychogenic cause. Once I finally accepted that the cause was psychological, only then did I make progress in overcoming the pain.
I only improved once I chose to believe that my physical symptoms were an expression of psychological stress.
So what is reality?
It’s a tautology, but I can’t experience anything beyond my own subjective experience.
Etymologically, “reality” comes from “res” which means “thing”.
Reality is just “all the things”.
We can’t disprove the subjectivist position that things only exist in our own experience of them, nor the skeptical position that we cannot know anything about reality beyond our experience of it, nor even the solipsist position that all reality might well exist only within my own mind.
Philosophers can argue about it, but we aren’t really looking for a philosophical position here.
What we’re looking for is the relationship between our thoughts, our feelings, and “all the things” of our experience.
What we want is to feel better, with the understanding that we have the power to change our feelings by changing our thoughts, and that this in turn will change our experience.
There’s only one “thing”
The testimony of mystics is that “all the things” are really just one thing — the expression and manifestation of a single divine being.
Our suffering and misery as humans comes from the identifying or “reification” of the one into many, and the attribution of independent existence and power to those many things – ourselves included.
Independence and separation give rise to thoughts of abandonment, of harm, of things going wrong. The moment we start thinking that we exist in a world of isolated things, we lose the freedom and grace of the divine spirit within us.
The metaphysical significance or “divine plan” behind delusion, sin, and evil varies between religions, but the important point is that it isn’t real, it doesn’t have independent existence; the divine alone exists.
When we think of reality as something “out there” with independent existence, and maybe (as my previous post explored) malicious or callous or corrosive to our well-being, we suffer.
We suffer just from thinking of it that way, let alone shifting our perception to seek out evidence that it is that way.
If I view “all the things” as existing out there, with their own independent existence and power, and I myself striving and struggling against them, then of course I feel bad.
What are “all the things” really? They are aspects of my experience, objects of my consciousness, forms and ingredients of this mysterious stream of awareness.
Do they really have their own existence, their own power?
Two realities become one
All my negative experiences have in common a kind of deference to external reality and power, a falling-back into the thought of things “out there” that aren’t the way I want them to be.
I view things as having their own existence and power, and therefore I imagine potential negative consequences if I don’t respond to them in the correct way.
Providence, grace, insight, wisdom, there are various names for it in different traditions, but altogether there’s a common understanding that the power of the divine, the one thing that actually exists, transcends and entirely overcomes the flawed sense that I’m an isolated human being struggling in a multifarious universe.
That’s why detachment, recollection, withdrawal from “worldly” concerns is a prominent theme in mysticism. But not for its own sake, only to allow us to come into alignment with the one.
In terms of “positive thinking” that means changing our thoughts to allow for providence or divine help to come to the fore in our experience, filling in all the gaps and drawing us into the flow that has always awaited us.