Keirsey is the go-to guy for linking the four temperaments to the MBTI, and while his views apparently shifted in the course of his career, this table seems right to me.
Phlegmatic = Keirsey’s Guardians = SJ
Sanguine = Artisans = SP
Melancholic = Idealist = NF
Choleric = Rational = NT
I was already pretty sure I was an INFP based on tests and self-typing, and it didn’t take long to conclude I was melancholic-phlegmatic either.
Why would an INFP be melancholic-phlegmatic?
Look at the functional stack: FiNeSiTe
That means my two strongest functions are introverted Feeling and extroverted Intuition, making me melancholic.
My two weaker functions are introverted Sensing – which is what defines a phlegmatic in Keirsey’s arrangement – and extroverted Thinking.
So if I use all my functions in their order of strength, I’ll be foremost melancholic (NF) and with a secondary phlegmatic (Si) temperament.
But in my case I also seem to have put a bit of extra emphasis on my inferior function Te. I’ve gone through phases of being very Te oriented, in terms of setting myself goals, seeking to be efficient, driven, and effective.
When push forward with Te, I go into uncharted territory where my Si isn’t especially helpful. That leaves me forming a weird combination of Ne and Te, a kind of makeshift choleric influence.
It also seems to trigger bouts of stress-related illness, suggesting an imbalance from all that extroversion.
But all of this taken together is why I would describe myself in temperament terms as a melancholic-phlegmatic with a bit of choleric thrown in.
When I compare myself to other melancholic-phlegmatics, they seem to lack my awesome yet debilitating penchant for intense thinking, and my bootstrapping attitude to getting s*** done…within my otherwise very melancholic-phlegmatic parameters.
They don’t seem to know how to push themselves in that turn-yourself-inside-out way I’ve grown to love.
I wouldn’t recommend doing what I’ve done, but it’s nice to know where the differences lie.